2/15/15

Anonymous is hitting ISIS harder than any government could

The hacking collective Anonymous is on the offensive yet again, striking the Islamic State’s many proactive social media users who use sites such as Twitter and Facebook to recruit for jihad terrorism.
In a series of posts on the website Pastebin over the weekend, purported members of Anonymous vow to continue “Operation Ice ISIS,” taking down websites and social media accounts of groups who assist in terrorist activities.

This new round of online attacks is meant to target individuals who are directly involved with planning and recruiting for attacks against civilians in Iraq and Syria.

“We will hunt you, take down your sites, accounts, emails, and expose you,” said the group in a YouTube video released over the weekend. “From now on, no safe place for you online…you will be treated like a virus, and we are the cure.” The post goes on to list hundreds of links to social media accounts in Arabic, classifying them by their “priority” status.

By standard analysis, these may be thought of as idle threats, but a cursory glance at the list reveals that most, if not all, the Twitter and Facebook accounts mentioned by Anonymous have indeed been suspended.

Added to the fact, Anonymous hackivists have claimed responsibility for similar attacks against the governments of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, who they claim have been funneling millions of dollars into ISIS extremists in the last year. That has been alleged by many British and American military sources, but still outright denied by the countries in question.

In targeting the social media outreach of ISIS, Anonymous has effectively hampered its number one recruiting tool, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, which studies jihadists’ web postings. This will limit the group’s abilities to reach out to followers and continue amassing support from sympathizers across the world, including those who commit lone wolf acts of terror in the west.

And by attacking the Islamic terror group at its central nervous system, that of social media, Anonymous has dealt a more devastating blow to ISIS than the 21 countries currently spending millions of dollars dropping bombs and stationing troops in parts of Iraq and Syria could ever hope to do. Where the military strategists are lacking, the computer hackivists are gaining ground.

While it doesn’t necessarily negate the notion of military strategy to defeat groups or armies who commit mass violence, it surely provides a different model that governments would be wise to adopt if they want to defeat the enemies of tomorrow.

Though the bombing campaign has killed over 6,000 ISIS fighters, according to U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Stuart Jones, it has only incited more committed jihadists to join the cause. The small band of thousands of rebels initially opposed to Syrian President Bashir al-Assad have now swelled to over 200,000 fighters with a much larger goal in mind, according to the Iraqi Kurdistan chief of staff, including increasingly more fighters from western states.
Oddly enough, it was these fighters who were given tacit support last year by the U.S. government and allies to help ouster al-Assad and overthrow his regime.


President Barack Obama is slated to ask Congress in the coming days for a war time authorization in order to continue bombing ISIS, according to Reuters, at last putting the nearly eight-month military campaign to a vote by the people’s representatives.

Obama previously vowed to “degrade and ultimately defeat ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counterterrorism strategy,” according to a Nov. 2014 letter he wrote to House Speaker John Boehner, proposing over $50 billion in additional military expenditures to continue operations in the Middle East.

The president’s proposed 2015 Defense Department budget stands at $535 billion, the highest in history.

Despite the incursions of the United States and its allies, the crisis in the Middle East has represented a total deconstruction of lives and wealth over the past decade.

The United Nations estimates nearly 4 million people have had to flee the violence in Syria and Iraq in just the past five years alone, creating a massive refugee crisis unprecedented since World War II.
On the fiscal side, the total estimated costs for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were between $4-6 trillion, according to one Harvard University study by Professor Linda Bilmes, more than the entire GDP of Japan, the third richest country in the world behind China and the United States.

Leave us a comment below! :

17 comments:

  1. This "Anonymous" campaign reeks of governmental undercover operation. IS obviously are a bunch of idiotic assassins, but even so, if governments openly and massively took down private accounts and web pages supporting IS, it would be controversial.

    We have recently seen online attacks claimed by "Anonymous" that were clearly not. I refer to attacks to Catalan websites and accounts supporting independance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. funny that this is mentioned because while I was reading this blog the thought crossed my mind, 'how do we know it was them and not an imposter'. It is always best to question everything, even when it is seemingly something desirable. The post has made a connection with me and I am happy for that, thank you.

      Delete
    2. I am with you all the way brothers!!

      Delete
    3. I stand by anonymous 100%

      Delete
  2. Anonymous working as a government op - I DOUBT THAT. They are doing more then the government and they are NOT getting paid for it, so it is done for the right reasons. People who think Anonymous has anything to do with any government, have NO idea what Anonymous is about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So why can't a few government employees join anonymous and work under their name? This doesn't necessarily mean that anonymous is working with the government. Doesn't that sound plausible?

      Delete
    2. I stand with u my brothers

      Delete
    3. It is obvious that some have NO idea about the endless possibilities that life has to offer. Just remember many people working for the government sacrifice much more than most common people do when they leak info or do something they are not supposed to. Some of which are murdered if not all. Think about it long and hard with an open mind and anyone doing this will remember the truth, the facts, the possibilities of all things and not just the narrow minded stereotypes many are superimposing on others. There are many people in many different outfits that do not abide by whatever code of conduct an organization enforces. We are not all robots of a program and many think with justice of the people and use the free will we were all born with. Duh! Think first. It is our greatest asset.

      Delete
  3. I fear that the Anonymous movement is growing too fast. These days one cannot tell good from evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree we are in times where we can't tell the deference between good intention and evil ones.. Hitler lied to Germany with dreams of a better future at the start and we all know how that ended .. I mean it's good someone is doing something about this I support it but we always need to keep eyes on a fast growing army before history repeats itself

      Delete
    2. Anonymous is good

      Delete
    3. Too big too quick allows false ideology to corrupt.

      Delete
    4. Is it not a fact that good and evil are only judgements, labels made by others who mean to control another and make one lesser than the other. Does good and evil really exist? If a person kills, is that person evil? Or, is the person good? If the person killed because the other killed first is the murdering justified? If a person steals food because of starving is it evil or good? There is the finest line between good and evil. More or less it is a label. We all die, is this an evil act of nature merely because many of us want to live? Question everything. Always question, question, question.

      Delete
  4. It's not completely crazy or anything. You just have to weigh the benefits to the government of being able to attack private internet use without backlash against the potential debits of the rise in anon's profile when they as a group get the credit, and the creation of the idea that a bunch of anarchists are doing a better job of fighting IS than governments are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I stand behind anonymous and all the Wonderful things their doing 150%. These ppl have a set of incredible skills tht they could be using to commit horrible crimes and destruction etc but instead their using their incredible skills for the greater good, trying to stop terrorists and cps corruption. Their getting attention drawn to issues tht no one else has been successful at doing. I applaud anonymous, they are heroes and let's not forget all the time and effort it must take on their part. Their getting results, I'm glad to have anonymous to back me. Thank you anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  6. great work ; i am with u

    ReplyDelete
  7. Funny ... LOL ................
    Why nobody hacks to do a good thing? :-(

    ReplyDelete